CBFC might finally certify 'Padmavati' but only if filmmakers agree to certain modifications

The 'Padmavati' controversy has gone on long enough. However, it finally seems like there will soon come an end to the row. But, like always, there's a little twist. The Sanjay Leela Bhansali film will get a U/A certificate from the Central Board of Film Certification but only if the makers of the movie agree to a few modifications suggested by the CBFC.

A leading news agency quoted saying, "The film was approached with balanced view keeping in mind both the filmmakers and society. Considering complexities and concerns around the film the requirement for a special panel was felt by CBFC to add perspective to the final decision." The film was reviewed by a special panel constituted by the CBFC which also included historians after the makers of the film stated that it was partially based on historical facts. Giving out their verdict, the CBFC stated, "Special panel consisted of Arvind Singh from Udaipur, Dr Chandramani Singh and Professor KK Singh of Jaipur University. Panel member had insights and also some reservations regarding claimed historical events and socio-cultural aspects which were duly discussed at length.”

It was reported that they will certify the film firstly if the makers agree to 26 cuts, the name being changed to 'Padmavat' and if the makers agree to a disclaimer being put before the movie begins and during the interval. However, it will not be 26 cuts but 5 modifications. Prasoon Joshi himself clarified that there are only 5 modifications in ‘Padmavati’.

The CBFC chief said, “Incorrect. There are no cuts suggested in this film by the CBFC - only 5 modifications. First, to change the disclaimer to one that clearly does not claim historical accuracy. Second, the title is to be changed from 'Padmavati' to 'Padmavat' - as the filmmakers have attributed their creative source as the fictional poem Padmavat, and not history. Third, there will be modifications in the song 'Ghoomar', to make the depiction befitting to the character being portrayed. Fourth, modification to the incorrect/misleading reference to historical places. And the fifth is the addition of a disclaimer which clearly makes the point that the film in no manner subscribes to the practice of Sati or seeks to glorify it.”

Here's Delhi Times confirming the news:



The 190-crore film directed by Sanjay Leela Bhansali has drawn angry protests especially in Rajasthan where fringe groups like the Karni Sena have said that the movie "distorts history". Also, though they have not seen the movie, leaders of the Karni Sena and several politicians say the 13th-century queen, Padmini, has been disrespected by Bhansali suggesting that he, in his movie, has shown a very historically incorrect romantic scene too.

Stay tuned for more updates on the issue.